TimoMalum.com

Trump Reveals How He Really Feels About Guns.

“You can’t have guns. You can’t walk in with guns." 

(Referring to bringing a legal handgun to a legal protest.)

"I don’t like any shooting. I don’t like it. But I don’t like it when somebody goes into a protest and he’s got a very powerful, fully loaded gun with two magazines loaded up with bullets also. That doesn’t play good either."

(Referring to the death of Alex Pretti, a protester who was killed by ICE agents in Minneapolis.)

“We have to take the guns away from these people that have them and they are bad people that shouldn’t have them. Take the guns first, go through due process second."

(Referring to so-called "red flag" laws that allow law enforcement to confiscate guns from anyone considered to be a threat even when they have no criminal record and no history of mental illness.)

"I’m going to write the bump stock; essentially, write it out. So you won’t have to worry about bump stock. Shortly, that will be gone."

(Referring to Trump's executive order banning bump stocks on rifles. His order was eventually overturned by the Supreme Court.)

As social unrest grows in the United States, sparked by both ICE immigration enforcement and protests by Communist groups wanting a revolution, can we trust Donald Trump to defend our right to protect ourselves?

His own words aren't very reassuring.

Journalistic Deceit: An Example Of Why You Can't Trust The News Media.

I was looking at the website for channel 45 news, a local ABC affiliate in Winston Salem NC, when I saw a story in the "Trending" column headlined "Iranian news outlet reports over 36,000 killed in protests, marking historic bloodshed". I've been following reports on the protests since they began, and the number of deaths from the protests has generally been counted in the low thousands, not tens of thousands. So I read further in the story to learn what ABC 45 knew that others didn't. 

The story said "Iranian news site, Iran International, reported on Sunday that over 36,000 people have been killed during the height of the protests that took place earlier this month". There was no explanation of who Iran International is, but at first I assumed it's a news agency within Iran. But if so, why were they reporting ten times more deaths than the Iranian government? I did some digging and found that Iran International is owned by Volant Media, a company based in the United Kingdom. Volant Media doesn't reveal their ownership. But according to Wikipedia, it is "reportedly linked to Saudi Arabia, [and] it (Iran International) is aimed at Iranians and people interested in Iranian news, culture, politics, society and sports. Iran International has been heavily criticized by the Iranian government for actively encouraging Iranians into anti-government protests and riots by spreading fake news and propaganda and has been described as a tool of Mossad by Barak Ravid. During the Mahsa Amini protests on 9 November 2022, the Iranian Minister of Intelligence Ismail Khatib announced that Iran International had been declared a terrorist organization by the Islamic Republic of Iran, accused of inciting riots protesting the government."

"According to Middle East Eye, Iran International is a media platform for the Iranian opposition. The channel is known for raising the profile of Reza Pahlavi, the last heir apparent to the former Iranian throne, by constant coverage and repeatedly interviewing him."

Reza Pahlavi is the eldest son of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the last shah of Iran who eventually became a bribed puppet of the CIA.

It seems apparent that Iran International is essentially a propaganda agency posing as a legitimate news source. And I suspect if its true ownership could be discovered, we'd see funding from America's CIA, the United Kingdom's MI6, and Israel's Mossad.

We should question why ABC 45, owned by Sinclair Broadcasting, would use a source as obviously biased as Iran International. But they aren't alone. Zionist slop-site 'Breitbart' is also quoting them.

Yes, the same number of victims is repeated by Breitbart, and the source of that number is Iran International. Initially, Breitbart also reported that Khamenei had fled to a fortified bunker, but they've since removed that part of the story. But another news site still makes the claim: The Times of Israel.

They write: "Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has gone into hiding in a Tehran bunker, according to the opposition-affiliated Iran International news site". The news site 'India Today' also made the claim, and also gave credit to Iran International as their source. So in one day we have at least four news sites (and probably hundreds more if you count all the stations owned by Sinclair) that published unverified information portraying the leaders of Iran as horrible murderers.

The point of my post isn't to take sides either for or against Iran. The point is that what at first appears to be a legitimate news article on a local television station's website is in reality a biased story from a sketchy source that seems to have an agenda. And this same source is also being used by other news sites around the world.

The average reader doesn't have the time to find out where their news is coming from. Most find sites they like and then trust they're being told the truth.

But as I've revealed here, when you scratch beneath the surface you often find that what you thought was journalism is actually manipulation.

My Favorite Social Media Posts To Start 2026.

Ignorance Is Engineered Into The System Of Control.

O Emburrecimento programado: A engenharia da ignorância coletiva.

Programmed Stupidity: The Engineering of Collective Ignorance.

"We live in an era where knowledge is at our fingertips, but understanding has become a rare commodity. The phenomenon of 'programmed stupidity' doesn't emerge as paranoid fantasy, but as an uncomfortable diagnosis: the more access we have to information, the less capacity we develop to filter it, interpret it, and question the ready-made versions handed to us. It's as if they've discovered there's no need to censor ideas when you can simply saturate people's minds with superficial distractions.

The degradation of education, in turn, doesn't seem like an administrative error, but rather a carefully calibrated mechanism. A people who don't master logic, history, reading, or critical analysis become dependent on official narratives, accept any ready-made explanation, and react aggressively to anyone who tries to think differently. They're the ideal population for any power that prefers obedient followers over conscious citizens.

Meanwhile, incessant entertainment turns the brain into a passive receptor. The logic is simple: keep everyone busy, emotional, rushed, and above all, unable to stop and reflect, because reflection is dangerous. Deep thought generates questioning; questioning generates resistance; resistance bothers those comfortable at the top. Thus, collective brutishness stops being a side effect and becomes a precise instrument of domination.

In the end, the great irony is that we don't need explicit dictatorships to limit thought when the people themselves learn to reject complexity and prefer superficiality. 'Programmed stupidity' works because it offers relief: thinking hurts, questioning tires, understanding requires effort. And while many content themselves with the easier version of reality, those who manipulate the mechanisms continue operating in the shadows, always grateful to live in a society that, little by little, has unlearned how to think."

[image and text by Revellati]

News Media Pushes Flu Fear, Doctors Push Poison.

[Image by Engin Akyurt from Pixabay]

It's that time of year again, when the mind-control media begins pushing flu fear porn. The media collects billions of dollars in advertising revenue from pharmaceutical companies, so it's in their best interest to hype up diseases of all kinds along with the potions they claim will cure us. Wait, did I say "cure"? Maybe I should have picked a different word, since the medical establishment has shifted to a model where they only treat symptoms and manage diseases. It's far more profitable than actually making us healthy.

In addition to being great for business, fear is also a tactic of social control, used daily by government entities to steer the public wherever they want us to go. With national debts rising all over the world to unsustainable levels and programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and national healthcare all facing critical funding shortages, we now hear more and more politicians and so-called "thought leaders" pushing the concepts of depopulation and government-assisted suicide. The ruling elite and the supporters of the climate change cult have also advanced the idea that there are too many people on the planet and that billions of us need to be eliminated. Considering the proven dangers of vaccines, now would probably be a good time to avoid them altogether; are they being administered for our benefit, or is there a darker agenda? Are the news media and the medical industry unwitting partners in a program to cull humanity to what some consider to be sustainable levels? The possibility certainly exists, and with that in mind we should be cautious about what we allow to be injected into our bodies. Now is not the time for blind trust.

Here are several examples of the fear porn I found on just a handful of news sites within the state of North Carolina. Had I expanded my search nationwide I'm sure I would have found hundreds of other examples with many of the headlines repeated across multiple sites. It's the "mockingbird media" in full view, as only a handful of international corporations own all the media companies in the world, feeding us a carefully curated mix of truth, half-truths, and misinformation to limit our knowledge and our understanding of what's really happening around us.

In the stories above, we're told there's some kind of "super flu" rising across the US. But it's a complete lie, as no virus has ever been scientifically proven to spread any contagion from person to person. Researchers have actively tried to make people sick with the particles that some claim are flu viruses, going as far as swabbing mucous from the noses of sick people to the noses of well people, and none of the recipients of the mucous came down with the flu. The same methods, among others, have been tried with the common cold, but researchers have been unable to spread colds from one person to another even when test subjects were repeatedly sneezed upon by others with active symptoms. Simply put, there were no viruses being spread in any sort of contagion. So what are vaccines being used for? What possible benefit could they have other than to the people selling them? 

This is not to say that people aren't getting sick, but we need to step back, breathe, and consider other possibilities. And those other possibilities may not require dangerous interventions at the point of a syringe needle.

But regardless of the cause, when people get sick they want to feel better as quickly as possible, and natural remedies can take time to work. So what are doctors in the unnatural healthcare system recommending to their patients who are experiencing flu-like symptoms?

The CDC recommends these four drugs: Tamiflu, Xofluza, Relenza, and Rapivab. But despite their high costs, studies show that these medications only help you recover one day faster from the flu, a result so poor it could be attributed to the placebo effect. Even more important, all of these medications are effective only if they are taken within the first two days of having symptoms. Even then, how effective are they? What percentage of patients receive any benefit at all? Drug makers aren't releasing the data, so it's probably safe to say that these drugs don't work for the majority of the people who take them. And they all have potentially serious side effects that could affect you. These include seizures, hallucinations, sudden confusion, delirium, and anaphylactic shock. 

Health officials also recommend flu vaccines which they claim will protect you from the flu, but even in a good year these injections are only 30% effective using Big Pharma's own biased data. For the 2025/2026 season, research has shown that the vaccines actually have negative efficacy, making you 27% more likely to get sick than if you took nothing at all. Flu vaccines have been known to cause serious health issues, including hives, vomiting, shoulder injuries, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, and anaphylactic shock.

To summarize all of this is, yes, people do get sick with something, but there's no evidence that a virus can be blamed. Yet despite this, health officials push vaccines that can cause deadly reactions and chronic health conditions while offering no protection against the thing they claim the vaccines protect you from, and then they try to treat you with expensive, useless drugs that can make you sicker than you were before. If this is healthcare, I'm opting out.

Instead, I'm ignoring the fearmongering from the news media and I'm focusing on my overall wellness. I avoid stress as much as possible, I drink a variety of herbal teas, I get sunlight every day, and I supplement with vitamin d, vitamin c, multi-minerals, quercetin, magnesium, and black seed oil. My water is double filtered and I don't consume any toxins such as prescription drugs and alcohol. But don't automatically copy me; do your own research and develop your own plan based on your unique health situation.

Most of all, block out the fear. Happiness may be the best medicine of all.

Evil People Exploit The Desperate.

[image by Revellati Online]

"Não há negócio maior do que vender as pessoas desesperadas, um produto que garante eliminar o desespero."

English translation:

There's no bigger business than selling desperate people a product that guarantees to eliminate their desperation.