TimoMalum.com

News Media Pushes Flu Fear, Doctors Push Poison.

[Image by Engin Akyurt from Pixabay]

It's that time of year again, when the mind-control media begins pushing flu fear porn. The media collects billions of dollars in advertising revenue from pharmaceutical companies, so it's in their best interest to hype up diseases of all kinds along with the potions they claim will cure us. Wait, did I say "cure"? Maybe I should have picked a different word, since the medical establishment has shifted to a model where they only treat symptoms and manage diseases. It's far more profitable than actually making us healthy.

In addition to being great for business, fear is also a tactic of social control, used daily by government entities to steer the public wherever they want us to go. With national debts rising all over the world to unsustainable levels and programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and national healthcare all facing critical funding shortages, we now hear more and more politicians and so-called "thought leaders" pushing the concepts of depopulation and government-assisted suicide. The ruling elite and the supporters of the climate change cult have also advanced the idea that there are too many people on the planet and that billions of us need to be eliminated. Considering the proven dangers of vaccines, now would probably be a good time to avoid them altogether; are they being administered for our benefit, or is there a darker agenda? Are the news media and the medical industry unwitting partners in a program to cull humanity to what some consider to be sustainable levels? The possibility certainly exists, and with that in mind we should be cautious about what we allow to be injected into our bodies. Now is not the time for blind trust.

Here are several examples of the fear porn I found on just a handful of news sites within the state of North Carolina. Had I expanded my search nationwide I'm sure I would have found hundreds of other examples with many of the headlines repeated across multiple sites. It's the "mockingbird media" in full view, as only a handful of international corporations own all the media companies in the world, feeding us a carefully curated mix of truth, half-truths, and misinformation to limit our knowledge and our understanding of what's really happening around us.

In the stories above, we're told there's some kind of "super flu" rising across the US. But it's a complete lie, as no virus has ever been scientifically proven to spread any contagion from person to person. Researchers have actively tried to make people sick with the particles that some claim are flu viruses, going as far as swabbing mucous from the noses of sick people to the noses of well people, and none of the recipients of the mucous came down with the flu. The same methods, among others, have been tried with the common cold, but researchers have been unable to spread colds from one person to another even when test subjects were repeatedly sneezed upon by others with active symptoms. Simply put, there were no viruses being spread in any sort of contagion. So what are vaccines being used for? What possible benefit could they have other than to the people selling them? 

This is not to say that people aren't getting sick, but we need to step back, breathe, and consider other possibilities. And those other possibilities may not require dangerous interventions at the point of a syringe needle.

But regardless of the cause, when people get sick they want to feel better as quickly as possible, and natural remedies can take time to work. So what are doctors in the unnatural healthcare system recommending to their patients who are experiencing flu-like symptoms?

The CDC recommends these four drugs: Tamiflu, Xofluza, Relenza, and Rapivab. But despite their high costs, studies show that these medications only help you recover one day faster from the flu, a result so poor it could be attributed to the placebo effect. Even more important, all of these medications are effective only if they are taken within the first two days of having symptoms. Even then, how effective are they? What percentage of patients receive any benefit at all? Drug makers aren't releasing the data, so it's probably safe to say that these drugs don't work for the majority of the people who take them. And they all have potentially serious side effects that could affect you. These include seizures, hallucinations, sudden confusion, delirium, and anaphylactic shock. 

Health officials also recommend flu vaccines which they claim will protect you from the flu, but even in a good year these injections are only 30% effective using Big Pharma's own biased data. For the 2025/2026 season, research has shown that the vaccines actually have negative efficacy, making you 27% more likely to get sick than if you took nothing at all. Flu vaccines have been known to cause serious health issues, including hives, vomiting, shoulder injuries, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, and anaphylactic shock.

To summarize all of this is, yes, people do get sick with something, but there's no evidence that a virus can be blamed. Yet despite this, health officials push vaccines that can cause deadly reactions and chronic health conditions while offering no protection against the thing they claim the vaccines protect you from, and then they try to treat you with expensive, useless drugs that can make you sicker than you were before. If this is healthcare, I'm opting out.

Instead, I'm ignoring the fearmongering from the news media and I'm focusing on my overall wellness. I avoid stress as much as possible, I drink a variety of herbal teas, I get sunlight every day, and I supplement with vitamin d, vitamin c, multi-minerals, quercetin, magnesium, and black seed oil. My water is double filtered and I don't consume any toxins such as prescription drugs and alcohol. But don't automatically copy me; do your own research and develop your own plan based on your unique health situation.

Most of all, block out the fear. Happiness may be the best medicine of all.

Urgent Message From Dr Mike Yeadon.

Flu vaccines cannot protect against flu because the entire model is false. You don’t “catch the flu”, you develop it. There is no scientific evidence for the existence of “flu viruses” (or any other kind of virus). Consequently, whatever is in the vaccine vials, it’s nothing to do with an alleged submicroscopic infectious entity. This is unquestionably fraudulent. Senior officials in pharma, in government, in regulators and the medical profession all know this is nonsense and it has been going on for more than a few decades. See Substack of Katherine Watt, who has forensically examined public health and vaccine laws in USA going back more than 100 years. There isn’t any uncertainty or debate to be had here. Just go & read, then argue.

Oh, and NEVER roll up your sleeve and NEVER permit anyone to inject your babies & children with anything described as a vaccine. These are backed with enormous amounts of resource, punishing professionals who even dare ask questions about their efficacy or safety, and smears members of the public for asking questions, too. No other product of the pharmaceutical industry is defended so zealously as are vaccines. There’s a very good reason for that stark contrast, which is itself a powerful clue that they’re not what they claim to be. The rate of chronic illness in people who received “the vaccine schedule” in the USA, now amounting to more than 70 injections from day of birth to late teens, is markedly inferior to the unvaccinated. At least seven properly conducted comparisons make this abundantly clear. Again, it’s not a subtle difference. These injections injure & occasionally kill people and they’re intended to do so.

As a former pharma industry executive and later, consultant to dozens of biotechs, someone who founded & led a biotech then acquired by the largest pharmaceutical company, and having a training in toxicology and a PhD in respiratory pharmacology, I am amply qualified to have arrived at these judgments. I have been speaking out for 5 1/2 years because this is merely part of an insidious control agenda, which is right now moving into a critical phase: installation of dynamic, biometric digital ID. The perpetrators are counting on your passivity and reluctance to challenge orthodox or even ask questions. 

Ignore this at your peril.

There is still time to defeat the perpetrators plans by not remaining passive, refusing to be silent and denying them your consent to anything to do with identification. You can already identify yourself as needed. It’s the perpetrators who absolutely must have this new dynamic, digital ID system in place, in order to control everything you do as well as to coerce you into doing things you know are against your interests. 

There are no limits to what these people will do. Be vigilant and confident that you’re on the right side of history. 
 
Dr Mike Yeadon

former V.P. and Chief Science Officer at Pfizer

[source: Dr Yeadon's Telegram page]

Never Forget Their Excuses for Lockdowns.

story by John Tamney / image by Alexandra Koch

The worst arguments against the lockdowns inspired by the coronavirus were medical and statistical. To see why, it’s worth remembering that as humans we’ve evolved to protect ourselves from death and disease. The taking of freedom to protect us is always and everywhere excess. 

The above statement of the obvious requires mention as free thinkers and free-thinking organizations continue to either ignore how they sat out the lockdowns, or worse, excuse their inaction amid a massive bludgeoning of freedom back in 2020. Let’s start with those trying to excuse their inaction.

The not-infrequently offered excuse is that since most organizations and individuals in the libertarian space either weren’t staffed by medical doctors or weren’t medical doctors themselves, how could they have made credible cases against the lockdowns? Instead, and rather than take a stand, they adopted “wait and see” approaches so that medical verdicts could be rendered. About those verdicts, some libertarian types are now saying that those who were publicly against the lockdowns back in 2020 were correct, but they made their cases obnoxiously and blindly given their lack of medical knowledge. The only response to this kind of dissembling is nonsense, utter nonsense. See this write-up’s introductory paragraph to see why.

Just as the worst arguments against the lockdowns were medical and statistical, the medical and statistical arguments made in favor of lockdowns were, if possible, even worse. As stated above, no one requires force to avoid sickness or death. About this point, more on it in a bit.

For now, it should just be said that even if the medical consensus had been correct, that millions and millions of Americans would die absent being forced out of work and into their homes, then any lockdown orders foisted on us by nail-biting politicians would have read as tame relative to the precautions taken by free people. The more threatening anything is, the more superfluous is any kind of policy reaction to the threat.

The simple, overwhelming truth is that people should never have their individual freedom to protect themselves taken from them, period. End of story.

Applying the previous assertion to organizations like Cato, Students for Liberty, and others that seemingly took a “wait and see” approach to the lockdowns, their stances were wrongheaded. Lest they or readers forget, the organizations mentioned were founded on the notion of individual freedom as the foremost ideal. In which case a “wait and see what the science or medical establishment says” is dangerously wrong.

It is simply because, as Brownstone Institute founder Jeffrey Tucker has pointed out, politicians at the local, state, and national levels did not take a “wait and see” approach. That they didn’t calls into serious question organizations and individuals sitting on their hands. How could they? Since we know government will never wait and see on anything, what an odd excuse or piece of internal reasoning to explain away a lack of action. It implies that freedom should always be the loser in times of uncertainty, or when politicians are feeling particularly hysterical. 

At which point it should be said that freedom is easily the best way to turn the unknowns and uncertainty into true knowledge. So, while libertarian groups and individuals who sat out the lockdowns should reflexively defend freedom every time government is in the process of taking it, it’s useful to add that free people crucially produce information.

Which brings us back to the earlier assertion in this write-up that people don’t need to be forced to avoid sickness or death. Some no doubt responded as they read the latter that some people would in fact have lived, worked, and run their businesses without regard to a spreading virus. To which the answer here can only be precisely.

Precisely because free people will respond in all manner of ways (including disdain) to fears driven by unknowns, we need them to be free. Without millions of different responses, or realistically hundreds of millions of different responses in the US, people (including “experts”) will be blinded to the truth about whatever it is that threatens us, or not. Since free people once again produce information, the only answer to uncertainty about what we don’t know is freedom. 

It’s just something to keep in mind in the here and now. Four years ago this month, over 40 million Americans lost their jobs, and hundreds of millions around the world found themselves hurtling toward starvation amid a global panic among politicians. Shamefully and tragically, some of the foremost organizations and individuals devoted to liberty sat out the tragedy and seemingly defend their inaction to this day by hiding behind medicine, science, and a lack of information. The excuses and internal justifications are wholly insufficient. Freedom is its own always and everywhere virtue, period.

Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Source: The Brownstone Institute / RealClearMarkets.com

The Existential Threat of the Existential Threat.

Image by Gerd Altmann

The Existential Threat of the Existential Threat.

By Thomas Buckley

Climate change is an existential threat.

Misinformation is an existential threat.

Inequality is an existential threat.

The next pandemic is an existential threat.

Our democracy is facing an existential threat.

And everyone must be prepared for each of them and prepared to do anything to stop them.

That’s the current line, at least – the line that is driving global society at all levels just up to the edge of sanity and cohesion.

And that’s on purpose, because it’s much easier to push someone over the edge when they are already standing next to it.

Each of these false threats are being intentionally inflicted, becoming comorbidities on an already weakened body politic, making it even more vulnerable to its destruction and its eventual death.

Being told you are going to die is devastating. Being told you and your family are going to die is monumentally awful. Being told everyone is going to die is…numbing. It creates a state of utter helplessness, a state in which you are far more pliant.

Your situational awareness dims, your flight or fight sense slows, and you just stand and stare until someone puts their arm around your shoulders and leads you away.

And those invoking that dread are waiting nearby to do just that – take society by the shoulder, offer it comfort on the form of entertainment, medication, and basic sustenance, and lead it away.

Each of the threats is aimed directly at the first principle of Western society – the primacy of the individual. All the threats, all of the communitarianism being foisted upon the culture – including the claim that it is what group a person is a part of, not the person themselves, that is the most important defining human characteristic – have the same underlying message: the elimination of the idea that society is made up of discrete individuals with personal agency.

And from not acknowledging individual agency to not permitting it at all is a very short step.

That is the actual existential threat of the false existential threats now bouncing around the globe, clattering into people and families and societies and cultures and intentionally causing so much chaos and disruption that just standing in one place is not necessarily an irrational decision.

Of course, none of the current coming catastrophes are existential threats – they aren’t really threats at all but the vanguard of the global socialite socialists statists has made sure the public thinks they are, under penalty of ostracization, job loss, and censorship.

Besides not being actual threats, they cannot even remotely be described as an existential threat. An existential threat is – in part – defined as a threat to the very existence of a thing or a system. It is terminal, global, and transgenerational. It is not transitory, it is not political, it is not determined by the people making the claim: to be an existential threat something must be real and unprecedented and permanent.

But the term – which seems to be important-sounding because it actually is – can be misused by people and groups to heighten the impact of their statement, no matter what it may be, because the actual definition is either not widely known or purposefully ignored by the people using it and the media that reports what they are claiming.

This opens the door to anything being described as such a threat. 

There is also the issue of the origin of the term – existential philosophers focused on subjective ideas of thought and emotion and action as they relate to existence while the more concrete “threats” described when the term is used are putatively real and specific. That is an additional misleading element of the use of the term.

In other words, the term is used to apply a thin veneer of intellectual certainty to the threat that it is claiming actually exists.

Despite the protestations of the greenocracy, the real global existential threat is not fossil fuel or proper food or basic human mobility or all of the other aspects of the material economy. 

The real threat is from the ethereal economy of government agencies, civil society actors, non-governmental organizations, foundations, and academia, all aided by the information cabal. Together they do, in fact, currently have the power to foist something upon civilization that truly is transgenerational, global, and terminal.

And the never-ending pretense of emergency is a powerful tool in accomplishing that goal:

What happens when that dreaded decision whether to jump right or left in the face of an oncoming car is not a once or twice in a lifetime decision, but a daily question? That constant state of trepidation grinds on people, placing humans into a state of making most if not all decisions from a place of panic instead of reason.

And it is during that constant state of nervous exhaustion – a state manufactured out of whole cloth by its potential beneficiaries – when those who wish to wield power in society strike.

What is being offered is a society in which no one can fail. But a society in which no one can fail is also a society in which no one can succeed, especially to the point where they can threaten the existing power structure.

And it is that threat – which is an existential threat to that spider web of profitable tyranny – that is being targeted by the global fear noise.

The democracy being threatened is “their” democracy, not “our” democracy.

The climate being threatened is their silver sheened scrubbed personal environment – the actual environmental destruction that is occurring is out of sight, the denigrating of the sub-Deltas who inhabit other places, is immaterial.

The information being threatened are the lies being told to prop up the societal transformation.  

The equality being threatened is their right to be more equal than others forever.

And the pandemic being threatened is the right to declare a pandemic on a whim, terrifying the public into ceding basic rights in the name of safety.

The means and the ends are interchangeable, creating a Mobius Strip of dehumanization on which every degrading tactic can be hidden – unless you know exactly where they lay, they are visible only out of the side of the eye, an oblique uncertainty, and can be easily dismissed as figments, as conspiracy theories.

It cannot be known exactly what will be touted as the next existential threat.

What is already known is whom it will benefit.

Note – it may seem a bit odd, but then again really not, but it could behoove all of us to take the advice of Hannibal Lecter when considering what the societal serial killers are seeking:

Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License courtesy of The Brownstone Institute.

The Vaccines Have Frozen Them In Time

In the heartbreaking video above, parents speak with CHD's Polly Tommey about the injuries their children suffered from vaccines. The children are "frozen in time", the mother said.

Vaccines harm children. The childhood vaccine schedule that parents are bullied into giving to their kids is causing horrific, irreversible injuries. The list of shots is long, and many make no sense at all. Why are infants given Hepatitis B vaccines at birth? Why are they given a flu vaccine at six months old? Many vaccines are given as multiple injections all at once, yet no scientific studies have been done to see how these vaccines react with each other in the human body. By the time a child reaches the age of 18, he or she has received up to 80 vaccines, including boosters.

According to Children's Health Defense, "vaccines contain numerous concerning ingredients including aluminum, mercury, aborted fetal cell lines, antibiotics, monkey kidney cells, formaldehyde and more." Most doctors have no idea what's really in the shots they're pushing to trusting parents. And pharmaceutical companies have complete immunity from liability for any vaccine recommended on the CDC’s childhood schedule.

Before you make a mistake you can't change, check out this information on the CHD website:

Vaccine Curriculum: What Parents Need To Know

Once the needle goes in, you can't change your mind and pull the poison back out.  

May God Have Mercy On Their Souls.

"When children have almost zero chance of being negatively impacted by coronavirus but you sacrifice them for the greater good, may God have mercy on your souls...because we won't."

There is no valid science proving that SARS-CoV-2, the virus blamed for coronavirus, actually exists outside of a computer model. But many people still believe the myth that led to the pronouncement of a global pandemic in 2020. We now know that COVID was a psychological operation that rebranded ailments such as the flu into something that looked much more deadly, a psyop that could only succeed thanks to endless fear-mongering by the mainstream news media. People behaved irrationally for more than two years, and some wear masks even today. Doctors and hospitals were paid huge sums of money to diagnose people with COVID even when no symptoms existed. They were paid again when they vaccinated their patients.

Many of those patients were innocent, vulnerable children. 

Yet according to statistics, children were never at any risk. In fact, according to all-cause mortality data from around the world, there were no excess deaths in 2020. People died, but the numbers weren't higher than in past years. And children didn't seem to be suffering at all from any unusual illnesses. 

And yet they were vaccinated against COVID, often multiple times.

Now we have evidence that the COVID vaccines may be causing a long list of health conditions, including "brain fog", myocarditis, pericarditis, strokes, seizures, Guillain-Barré syndrome, cancer, and sudden death. 

Sadly, vaccinated children are experiencing these conditions now. But instead of stopping the jabs, we're being fed propaganda that tries to convince us that it's almost normal for children to have heart attacks. They tell us it's not the vaccines causing the harm, but rather it's the after effects of having COVID. Yet when challenged to prove a COVID virus actually exists, they have nothing.

Instead of admitting that the COVID vaccines are hurting our children, they double-down and tell us the jabs are "safe and effective" while they line their pockets with evil profits. A quick search for "should children get covid vaccines?" yields dozens of sites from the CDC and other medical institutions encouraging parents to have their kids vaccinated against COVID at least twice, and this is on top of the dozens of other dangerous vaccines that the medical industrial complex bullies parents into giving to their children.

Are we to believe that infants are born without enough vaccines in their bloodstreams? We have to keep injecting them with potentially toxic ingredients to keep them alive, as if God made a mistake?

"God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him."

Doctors are sacrificing the future health of children. The do it for profit. They do it out of fear of losing their jobs. They do it out of ignorance. And some do it to satisfy the demonic influences that control them. 

They better hope that God has more compassion for them than the parents who one day find out the truth of what was done to their children.

May God have mercy on their souls...because the parents won't.

-----------------------------------------------

"We Need To Talk" by the Chalkboard Campaign shows how vaccines are harming children. Take 4 minutes out of your day to view it, and then share it with your friends and family. You might save a life.